2014-09-09 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 11:43:20AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Factor out a piece of code from intel_pipe_set_base() that updates > > the pipe size and adjust fitter. > > > > This will help refactor the update primary plane path. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index 2ccf7c0..e7e7184 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > @@ -2779,6 +2779,46 @@ static bool intel_crtc_has_pending_flip(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > return pending; > > } > > > > +static void intel_update_pipe_size(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > These days we usually prefer to pass intel_crtc instead of drm_crtc. You > can still call it 'crtc' since that's shorter and because we don't need > anything from drm_crtc in this function there won't be any confusion > between the two. Actually we need the drm_crtc 3 times in this function, that is why I left it as an argument. We could just do the other way around and get it from &intel_crtc->base. Gustavo _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
