On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 04:51:12PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> drm_send_vblank_event() demands that we hold the event spinlock whilst
> calling it, so do so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index e2c7e3941465..4642a0e6f20c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -9981,8 +9981,11 @@ free_work:
> if (ret == -EIO) {
> intel_crtc_wait_for_pending_flips(crtc);
> ret = intel_pipe_set_base(crtc, crtc->x, crtc->y, fb);
> - if (ret == 0 && event)
> + if (ret == 0 && event) {
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
> drm_send_vblank_event(dev, pipe, event);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, flags);
That's what you get for sending a trivial patch before even testing it.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
