Re: [PATCH 57/89] drm/i915: Rewrite ABS_DIFF() in a safer manner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:32:24PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:11:24PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Sep 2014, Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The new version of the macro does a few things better:
> > >   - protect the arguments,
> > >   - only evaluate the arguments once,
> > >   - check that the arguments are of the same type,
> > >
> > > Change LC_FREQ_2K to be a unsigned 64bit constant and removed the '()'
> > > from the caller as a result.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Can be picked up for dinq separate from this series, right?
> 
> Yes, it can indeed.

s/can/must/ If the platform enabling changes shared code, that part must
go in through the normal merge process and has the same merge window
cutoff deadlines like everything else.

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux