On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 10:38:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:18:27AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 04:23:44PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > > From: Derek Foreman <derek.foreman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Really just for completeness - old init function ends up making the plane > > > exactly the same way due to the way the enums are set up. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Derek Foreman <derek.foreman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. And patch 2 is already merged from > the previous round. Actually I can't merge this patch since it's not authered by you, but is missing your signed-off-by line. Please resend with that fixed, thanks. If you handle a patch for the linux kernel, you _always_ have to add your sob in accordance with the Developer's Certificate of Origin. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
