Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Android sync points for i915 v2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 02:32:40PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> +static int i915_fence_check(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode, int flags,
> +			    void *key)
> +{
> +	struct i915_fence *intel_fence = wait->private;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *ring = intel_fence->ring;
> +
> +	if (!i915_seqno_passed(ring->get_seqno(ring, false),
> +			       intel_fence->seqno))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	fence_signal_locked(&intel_fence->base);
> +
> +	__remove_wait_queue(&ring->irq_queue, wait);
> +	fence_put(&intel_fence->base);
> +	ring->irq_put(ring);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool i915_fence_enable_signaling(struct fence *fence)
> +{
> +	struct i915_fence *intel_fence = to_intel_fence(fence);
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *ring = intel_fence->ring;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = ring->dev->dev_private;
> +	wait_queue_t *wait = &intel_fence->wait;
> +
> +	/* queue fence wait queue on irq queue and get fence */
> +	if (i915_seqno_passed(ring->get_seqno(ring, false),
> +			      intel_fence->seqno) ||
> +	    i915_terminally_wedged(&dev_priv->gpu_error))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (!ring->irq_get(ring))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	wait->flags = 0;
> +	wait->private = intel_fence;
> +	wait->func = i915_fence_check;
> +
> +	__add_wait_queue(&ring->irq_queue, wait);
> +	fence_get(fence);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}

This looks like it implements poll(). 

You should recheck i915_request_complete() after setting up the irq
waiter. Or does struct fence_ops handle that?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux