On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:31 PM, Jindal, Sonika wrote: > On 8/26/2014 4:58 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 04:23:40PM +0530, sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Adding new defines, older one will be removed in the last patch in the series. > >> This is to rename the defines to have levels instead of values for vswing and > >> pre-emph levels as the values may differ in other scenarios like low vswing of > >> eDP1.4 where the values are different. > >> > >> Done using following cocci patch for each define: > >> @@ > >> @@ > >> > >> # define DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_400 (0 << 0) > >> + # define DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0 (0 << 0) > > > > Could this perhaps be simply: > > > > #define DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING(x) ((x) << 0) > > > > As it is, there's no information about the value within the symbolic > > name anyway, so _LEVEL_* really isn't that useful and keeping several > > macros for each value seems isn't either. > > > I feel _LEVEL_* makes it more readable and since there are only 4 values > possible, it is ok to have 4 different macros for readability purpose. > What do you think? (+cc Damien Lespiau) Personally, I also think that LEVEL_* looks more readable. Best regards, Jingoo Han > > An alternative would be to provide a second set of defines for eDP 1.4 > > where the name implies the meaning and then use them as appropriate. > > > > Thierry > > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
