Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests/pm_psr: Update pm_psr for new psr debug interface.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:58:44AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/pm_psr.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/pm_psr.c b/tests/pm_psr.c
> index 3ab7e7a..8b92d84 100644
> --- a/tests/pm_psr.c
> +++ b/tests/pm_psr.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@
>  #include <errno.h>
>  
>  #include "drmtest.h"
> +#include "intel_chipset.h"
> +#include "igt_debugfs.h"
> +
> +#define HAS_PSR(dev) (IS_HASWELL(dev) | IS_BROADWELL(dev))

I don't like duplicating the HAS_PSR macros in the igt testcases. Instead
they should check whether the debugfs file is there and whether PSR is
there and skip accordingly.
-Daniel

>  
>  #define SLEEP_DURATION 5000 // in milliseconds
>  
> @@ -41,22 +45,31 @@ static int get_perf(const char *path)
>  	FILE *file;
>  	char str[4];
>  
> -	file = fopen(path, "r");
> -	igt_assert(file);
> +	file = igt_debugfs_fopen("i915_edp_psr_status", "r");
> +	igt_require(file);
>  
>  	ret = fscanf(file, "Sink_Support: %s\n", str);
>  	igt_skip_on_f(ret == 0,
>  		      "i915_edp_psr_status format not supported by this test case\n");
>  	igt_require(strcmp(str, "yes") == 0);
> +
>  	ret = fscanf(file, "Source_OK: %s\n", str);
>  	igt_assert(ret != 0);
> -
>  	igt_require(strcmp(str, "yes") == 0);
>  
>  	ret = fscanf(file, "Enabled: %s\n", str);
>  	igt_assert(ret != 0);
>  	igt_assert(strcmp(str, "yes") == 0);
>  
> +	ret = fscanf(file, "Active: %s\n", str);
> +	igt_assert(ret != 0);
> +	ret = fscanf(file, "Busy frontbuffer bits: %s\n", str);
> +	igt_assert(ret != 0);
> +	ret = fscanf(file, "Re-enable work scheduled: %s\n", str);
> +	igt_assert(ret != 0);
> +	ret = fscanf(file, "HW Enabled & Active bit: %s\n", str);
> +	igt_assert(ret != 0);
> +
>  	ret = fscanf(file, "Performance_Counter: %i", &perf);
>  	igt_assert(ret != 0);
>  
> @@ -68,14 +81,14 @@ static int get_perf(const char *path)
>  
>  igt_simple_main
>  {
> -	int ret, perf1, perf2;
> -	int device = drm_get_card();
> +	int perf1, perf2;
> +	int drm_fd = drm_open_any();
> +	uint32_t devid = intel_get_drm_devid(drm_fd);
>  	char *path;
>  
>  	igt_skip_on_simulation();
>  
> -	ret = asprintf(&path, "/sys/kernel/debug/dri/%d/i915_edp_psr_status", device);
> -	igt_assert(ret != -1);
> +	igt_skip_on(!HAS_PSR(devid));
>  
>  	perf1 = get_perf(path);
>  	sleep(SLEEP_DURATION / 1000);
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux