On 26.08.2014 20:52, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:23:54 +0200 > Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> This happens in irq_postinstall before we've set the pm._irqs_disabled flag, >>> but shouldn't warn. So add a nowarn variant to allow this to happen w/o >>> a backtrace and keep the rest of the IRQ tracking code happy. >>> >> Also the commit message is a bit thin on the usual details like which >> commits introduced this regression, so that maintainers know where to >> apply this to. > > I don't have the commit... Oliver do you have it handy? > Hm - I really can not tell what has been done to introduce this regression. I just saw the warning on my machine after upgrading to 3.17 ... You can ask me about linux/net/can/ but not the drm stuff ;-) Cheers, Oliver _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
