On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:13:06PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:07:40PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:58:06PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 01:49:10PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > > Chris has decided that enough is enough. It's time to fixup dev Vs > > > > dev_priv. This is a modest contribution to the crusade. > > > > > > > > v2: Still use INTEL_INFO(), for the (mythical!) case we want to hardcode > > > > the info struct with defines (Chris) > > > > Rename the macro argument from 'dev' to 'dev_priv' (Jani) > > > > > > > > v3: Use names unlikely to be used as macro arguments (Chris) > > > > > > I can be annoying! These macros typically take the iter as the first > > > argument... > > > > How typical is your typical? > > list_for_each and everything derived from them that paid attention... > > > #define for_each_pipe(__dev_priv, __p) > > #define for_each_crtc(dev, crtc) > > #define for_each_intel_crtc(dev, intel_crtc) > > #define for_each_intel_encoder(dev, intel_encoder) > > #define for_each_encoder_on_crtc(dev, __crtc, intel_encoder) > > #define for_each_connector_on_encoder(dev, __encoder, intel_connector) > > > > Sounds like a lot of churn for no good reason this time. > > Or that I forgot to tell you about this detail last time. I think a lot of those are on me ;-) Patch merged to dinq, thanks. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx