On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 03:06:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index 51b4cd29f932..83eabd758ed9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ static void vlv_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc) > BUG_ON(!IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv->dev)); > > /* PLL is protected by panel, make sure we can write it */ > - if (IS_MOBILE(dev_priv->dev) && !IS_I830(dev_priv->dev)) > + if (IS_MOBILE(dev_priv->dev)) > assert_panel_unlocked(dev_priv, crtc->pipe); My gut feeling is that the IS_MOBILE check could also be dropped. Not quite sure though since VLV_D is not mentioned anywhere in the docs AFAICS. Anyway dropping the 830 check definitely makes sense so: Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I915_WRITE(reg, dpll); > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
