Use the correct mask for the unlock bits. In theory this could have lead to incorrect asserts but this is unlikely in practise. Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 0b327ebb2d9e..fe1d00dc9ef5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@ static void assert_panel_unlocked(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, val = I915_READ(pp_reg); if (!(val & PANEL_POWER_ON) || - ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS)) + ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_MASK) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS)) locked = false; if (I915_READ(lvds_reg) & LVDS_PIPEB_SELECT) -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
