On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 06:34:06PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > -#define for_each_pipe(p) for ((p) = 0; (p) < INTEL_INFO(dev)->num_pipes; (p)++) > +#define for_each_pipe(dev, p) for ((p) = 0; (p) < (dev)->info.num_pipes; (p)++) > #define for_each_sprite(p, s) for ((s) = 0; (s) < INTEL_INFO(dev)->num_sprites[(p)]; (s)++) I think we still want to keep the INTEL_INFO() as that seems to be the favourite for eliminating deadcode when compiling for a subset of generation. It doesn't hurt to keep it around for a little longer. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
