On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
The GEN6_PM* registers don't exist on BDW anymore, so when we read
this file we trigger unclaimed register errors. The equivalent BDW
register for PMs is GEN8_GT_I*R(2), so use it.
Testcase: igt/pm_rpm/debugfs-read
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 9e737b7..17bd20ff 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1024,6 +1024,7 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
u32 rpstat, cagf, reqf;
u32 rpupei, rpcurup, rpprevup;
u32 rpdownei, rpcurdown, rpprevdown;
+ u32 pm_ier, pm_imr, pm_isr, pm_iir, pm_mask;
int max_freq;
/* RPSTAT1 is in the GT power well */
@@ -1061,12 +1062,21 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+ if (IS_GEN6(dev) || IS_GEN7(dev)) {
+ pm_ier = I915_READ(GEN6_PMIER);
+ pm_imr = I915_READ(GEN6_PMIMR);
+ pm_isr = I915_READ(GEN6_PMISR);
+ pm_iir = I915_READ(GEN6_PMIIR);
+ pm_mask = I915_READ(GEN6_PMINTRMSK);
+ } else {
+ pm_ier = I915_READ(GEN8_GT_IER(2));
+ pm_imr = I915_READ(GEN8_GT_IMR(2));
+ pm_isr = I915_READ(GEN8_GT_ISR(2));
+ pm_iir = I915_READ(GEN8_GT_IIR(2));
Why do we care only about GT(2) interrupt reg?
What about other 0, 1 and 3 regs?
Could this explain GT3 failures?
+ pm_mask = I915_READ(GEN6_PMINTRMSK);
+ }
seq_printf(m, "PM IER=0x%08x IMR=0x%08x ISR=0x%08x IIR=0x%08x, MASK=0x%08x\n",
- I915_READ(GEN6_PMIER),
- I915_READ(GEN6_PMIMR),
- I915_READ(GEN6_PMISR),
- I915_READ(GEN6_PMIIR),
- I915_READ(GEN6_PMINTRMSK));
+ pm_ier, pm_imr, pm_isr, pm_iir, pm_mask);
seq_printf(m, "GT_PERF_STATUS: 0x%08x\n", gt_perf_status);
seq_printf(m, "Render p-state ratio: %d\n",
(gt_perf_status & 0xff00) >> 8);
--
2.0.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
