On Sat, 09 Aug 2014, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Adapt the macro so that we can pass either the struct drm_device or the
> struct drm_i915_private pointers and get the answer we want. Over time,
> my plan is to convert all users over to using drm_i915_private and so
> trimming down the pointer dance. Having spent a few hours chasing that
> goal and achieved over 8k of object code saving, it appears to be a
> worthwhile target. This interim macro allows us to slowly convert over.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> index 39988940d468..49149406fcd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_dma.c
> @@ -1585,6 +1585,9 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
> if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET) && !dev->agp)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* For the ugly agnostic INTEL_INFO macro */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*dev_priv) == sizeof(*dev));
> +
> dev_priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (dev_priv == NULL)
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 0aef763ffa75..e66465430bdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2063,7 +2063,8 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
> int count;
> };
>
> -#define INTEL_INFO(p) (&to_i915(p)->info)
> +#define __I915__(p) ((sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(struct drm_i915_private)) ? (struct drm_i915_private *)(p) : to_i915((struct drm_device *)p))
The explicit casts make me uncomfortable. Indeed, aren't they completely
unnecessary? If the sizeof matches, p is expected to be struct
drm_i915_private *, and if not, it's expected to be struct drm_device *,
right?
#define __I915__(p) ((sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(struct drm_i915_private)) ? (p) : to_i915(p))
Otherwise you won't even get a compiler warning if you pass a random
pointer to this macro.
BR,
Jani.
> +#define INTEL_INFO(p) (&__I915__(p)->info)
> #define INTEL_DEVID(p) (INTEL_INFO(p)->device_id)
>
> #define IS_I830(dev) (INTEL_DEVID(dev) == 0x3577)
> --
> 2.1.0.rc1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
