On 8 August 2014 02:00, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Despite the claims of >> >> commit 48ba813701eb14b3008edefef4a0789b328e278c >> Author: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Tue Jul 22 18:46:09 2014 +0200 >> >> drm: drop redundant drm_file->is_master >> >> drm_file->is_master is not synomous with having drm_file->master == >> drm_file->minor->master. This is because drm_file->master is the same >> for all drm_files of the same generation and so when there is a master, >> every drm_file believes itself to be the master. Confusion ensues and >> things go pear shaped when one file is closed and there is no master >> anymore. > > Uagh, embarrassing. A revert is fine with me, but I'll try to review > your patch once I get home. > At this point I'll just revert, though I do like the wrapper instead of checking the flag, but its late in the day. Dave. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
