On Tue, 5 Aug 2014 18:08:16 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But yes, I want the Android guys to try this out too. I've already > > pinged them internally to check things out. Probably the biggest > > remaining opens there would be having a timeline for the display side > > of things too that covers vblank and page flip events as fences in a > > separate namespace. > > > > Which makes me think going back to just using the Android structs > > directly might be easier... > > Why that? They should really just provide the userspace interface on top ... Because the internal implementation has the nice timeline/sync pt/fence abstraction. It just fits nicely, conceptually, with the various timelines we have in gfx. For fences, I guess we'll need separate fence contexts for display and the rings. And we can still combine them with the sync_fence api, so it should be equivalent. I'm just still thinking in terms of the Android bits and not the struct fence bits; I'll probably come around eventually. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
