On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 10:39:42AM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> While those messages are interesting, there aren't _that_ interesting.
> We don't need them in the kernel logs by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx>
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index ce890f0..0ce4ac3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -4441,7 +4441,7 @@ intel_dp_drrs_init(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> }
>
> if (dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type != SEAMLESS_DRRS_SUPPORT) {
> - DRM_INFO("VBT doesn't support DRRS\n");
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("VBT doesn't support DRRS\n");
> return NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -4449,7 +4449,7 @@ intel_dp_drrs_init(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> (dev, fixed_mode, connector);
>
> if (!downclock_mode) {
> - DRM_INFO("DRRS not supported\n");
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DRRS not supported\n");
> return NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -4460,7 +4460,7 @@ intel_dp_drrs_init(struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port,
> intel_dp->drrs_state.type = dev_priv->vbt.drrs_type;
>
> intel_dp->drrs_state.refresh_rate_type = DRRS_HIGH_RR;
> - DRM_INFO("seamless DRRS supported for eDP panel.\n");
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("seamless DRRS supported for eDP panel.\n");
> return downclock_mode;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
