Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > intel_flush flushes any pending acceleration operations to the > hardware, just like intel_uxa_batch_submit does today except that it is > not uxa-specific. This seems like an obvious cleanup (and in one case a fix), and we ought to even apply it right away as long as it still calls intel_glamor_flush(). If it did, it gets: Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> even before we sort out the rest of the series.
Attachment:
pgpFxqYs4Cv9o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
