On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:24:06PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:32:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > [...] > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c > [...] > > + ret = wait_event_timeout(dev->vblank[crtc].queue, > > + C, msecs_to_jiffies(100)); > > 100 milliseconds looks like a very arbitrary choice. Theoretically we > support things like crtc->mode.vrefresh = 5, so I wonder if we should > parameterize this on the refresh rate, or simply increase it further? Once we have 10Hz panels I think we can pump/fix this. In i915 we've used 50ms everywhere, and never hit this. Except when driver bugs, ofc. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
