On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:19:26AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 01:14:30PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > This adds two new data points to the trace event, wait time, and whether > > or not the event slept. Both of these should already be obtainable > > through various means. This patch just makes the data more accessible. > > Right, the key point is that since the advent of the wait_begin/_end > pair is that we now allow concurrent non-blocking waits. > > > Wait is obtainable with the current code by matching seqnos in > > begin/end. In simple cases where begin/ends are always paired, this is > > trivial. However, if you queue up multiple begins/ends, it can get > > confusing. We're already calculating wait time, so it's trivially added > > here. This patch also provides the slightly more accurate wait_time as > > opposed to the timestamps from the tracepoint. It's observable, but just > > noise. > > > > The second bit of information, whether or not the operation slept is > > helpful in determining where time went. This is probably also obtainable > > through the scheduler events. However, we have the information easily at > > our fingertips, we may as well give it out. > > > > This results in an event which looks like: > > gem_gtt_hog 409 [000] 32.012641: i915:i915_gem_request_wait_end: dev=0, ring=3, seqno=4294963203, duration=0.000368225 (slept=yes) > > > > While here, rename sleep_time to wait_time since the verb sleep hasn't > > been true for a long time (several conditions exist where it won't > > sleep). > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Other than the debate in the earlier patch, this looks fine. > -Chris > I actually don't think wait_begin is a terribly interesting event after this patch BTW, but I didn't want to rock the boat too much. If you agree, I can send that one as well. -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx