On 7/18/2014 4:26 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx>
This series prepares future platform enabling by changing HAS_PCH_SPLIT to more
appropriate check since the code accessed may not have anything to do with
having PCH or not.
Hi Sonika,
HAS_PCH_SPLIT() is true for Ironlake (gen 5) as it's paired with the
Ibex Peak PCH.
In various patches, the condition needs to be INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 5
then.
I am sorry, my understanding was that HAS_PCH_SPLIT is equivalent to
(gen > 5 && !(IS_VALLEYVIEW) )
So, is it like, HAS_PCH_SPLIT is equivalent to (gen >=5 && !(IS_VALEYVIEW))
-Sonika
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
