On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:22:38PM +0100, daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > > The context used to execute a batchbuffer is becoming increasingly > important. Duplicating to avoid modifications to the original trace. I am sure we don't want both. The structure encoding is exposed to userspace so we are free to update the tracepoints within reason. I would also like a better ctx identifier than its pointer. Using the pointer for tracking objects makes it more difficult to read traces (although it is easy for scripts). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
