Daniel Vetter schreef op ma 14-07-2014 om 09:18 [+0200]: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:40AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 08:56 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > index 82e7d57f0a8a..f0be855ddf45 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > > @@ -11914,6 +11914,7 @@ static void intel_sanitize_crtc(struct intel_crtc *crtc) > > > * ... */ > > > plane = crtc->plane; > > > crtc->plane = !plane; > > > + crtc->primary_enabled = true; > > > dev_priv->display.crtc_disable(&crtc->base); > > > crtc->plane = plane; > > > > > > > Instead of the revert or on top of the revert? > > Instead of the revert as an attempt at a proper bugfix. If it doesn't work > my theory about what's going on on your machine is all wrong ;-) v3.16-rc5 with that "attempt at a proper bugfix" applied doesn't show the WARNING anymore. Please note that I didn't actually bother to test whether v3.16-rc5 by itself, somehow, fixed things. I guess that's rather unlikely. But if you'd like to be sure I'll even build and boot v3.16-rc5 without your attempt at a bugfix. Thanks! Paul Bolle _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
