On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:59:29AM -0700, Volkin, Bradley D wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:30:08AM -0700, Chris Wilson wrote: > > You need to check that the shrinker hasn't truncated your backing > > storage whilst it was marked DONTNEED. It just amounts to checking for > > obj->madv == __I915_MADV_PURGED in pool_get() and discarding the cache > > entry if it has been truncated. > > Ok. When we hit a purged object, do you think it's worth doing a retry loop (as > in libdrm's cache) or just fall straight through to allocating a new object? I'd keeping going through the cache, deleting purged entries until we find a usable object (or we have cleared the list). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
