On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:41:12PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote: > >Missing from this series, your two documentation patches (we need to > >bundle things up as a entity that makes sense for one of the maintainers > >to pick it up (either Dave or Daniel)). > > > I was not aware that documentation patches should also be part of this. > Because I was asked to send the igt testcase separately I thought > documentation will also go separately. Documentation patches have > also got reviewed-by tags. What do you suggest? Should I send the > patchset again with documentation? Will Igt still be a separate > post? Please, resend the series entirely once again, with the latest review tags added, the mutex locking around update_fbc() and the documentation patches. The reason with the documentation patches are part of this series is that adding documentation is a requirement for adding new properties so the whole DRM subsystem has a chance to converge towards a common set of properties. That series should also be annotated with a v3 in the cover letter. Cheers, -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx