On 6/18/2014 5:09 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:32:00PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 02:27:27PM +0530, sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx>
Testcase for 180 degree HW rotation
Cc: sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@xxxxxxxxx>
The test looks good to me (I haven't checked in details, the bar for igt
is quite a bit lower). It shows two gaps in the igt kms API:
- Retrieving the primary plane (there's a series from Matt fixing this
and exposing the primary plane through igt_output_get_plane())
- Adding a set_property() convenience function
(ala igt_plane_set_property("rotation", BIT(DRM_ROTATE_180)))
(no-one is working on that just yet, can de done later)
A small question before pushing this, have you checked that the test
correctly skips when running with a kernel without rotation support?
Note: don't push userspace using new ABI until that ABI has been
agreed upon and committed to the kernel.
-Chris
Hi Chris,
Are you referring to igt kms APIs? In this igt we are not using any API
which is not merged.
-Sonika
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
