On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 09:50:33AM +0000, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel > > Vetter > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 10:01 PM > > To: Mateo Lozano, Oscar > > Cc: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 53/53] !UPSTREAM: drm/i915: Use MMIO > > flips > > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:38:11PM +0100, oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gupta@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > If we want flips to work, either we create an Execlists-aware version > > > of intel_gen7_queue_flip, or we don't place commands directly in the > > > ringbuffer. > > > > > > When upstreamed, this patch should implement the second option: > > > > Usually we just mention such requirements in the cover letter of the series > > and don't include them. > > -Daniel > > Well, since we have it here, there is something I wanted to ask about this: > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(use_mmio_flip, "use MMIO flips (-1=never, 0=driver discretion [default], 1=always)"); > > The "driver discretion" option will blow up with Execlists :( > How do I tackle this? an execlists version of intel_gen7_queue_flip? sanitizing use_mmio_flip when execlists get enabled? I really don´t have a preference... Why does execlist make it hard to add a command to the last lrc that the object was on? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
