On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:03:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Just very cursory look at it, but this conflicts badly (well the > integration with the driver) with my frontbuffer tracking stuff. My idea > was to essentially hide all the fbc integration points we have sprinkled > all over behind that one and maybe even switch to manual invalidation for > gt rendering with a cpu register write and ditch all the complexity we > have with injecting cmds into rings right now. I'm inclined to agree. I think it would be (on the GEM side) much simpler and be a much better base to build upon. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
