On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 01:59:14PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > X could end up putting the fbcon fb into other domains, e.g. > for smooth take-overs. Also we want this for accurate frontbuffer > tracking: The set_config is an implicit flush and will re-enable > psr and similar features, so we need to bring the bo back into > the gtt domain. Is this possibly an atomic path? It would be nice to have a note on fb_ops which were. But I remember having lots of in_atomic() handling for fbdev acceleration (copied from nouveau). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
