On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 04:14:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. Aside: Checkpatch complained about > some unaligned function parameters. Please try to get that right for the > next patch since it really helps with readability. Fixed up while > applying. Oh well, I have a slight refinement because I grew tired of seeing spurious syncs being reported: > > - ret = dev_priv->display.queue_flip(dev, crtc, fb, obj, ring, page_flip_flags); > > + if (use_mmio_flip(ring, obj)) Just before this point we call pin_and_fence, but really we want to do so here instead with pin_and_fence(obj, obj->ring); work->gtt_offset = blah; > > + ret = intel_queue_mmio_flip(dev, crtc, fb, obj, ring, > > + page_flip_flags); > > + else and pin_and_fence(obj, ring); work->gtt_offset = blah; here > > + ret = dev_priv->display.queue_flip(dev, crtc, fb, obj, ring, > > + page_flip_flags); > > if (ret) > > goto cleanup_unpin; -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
