On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 07:52:25AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:51:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > +static void intel_mark_fb_busy(struct drm_device *dev,
> > + unsigned frontbuffer_bits,
> > + struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
> > {
> > - struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
> > enum pipe pipe;
> >
> > - intel_edp_psr_exit(dev);
> > -
> > if (!i915.powersave)
> > return;
>
> I think this wants to be moved from here down to
> intel_increase_pllclock. It's a little dangerous here as we use it
> inconsistently, and we certainly want to keep tracking fb bits for other
> reasons.
powersave was originally the overall blocker for all things power saving
related. We already have separate knobs for all real features, so I guess
we could just rip this out - it doesn't actually guard much of anything,
is inconsistent and always enabled anyway.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
