Re: [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Track the psr dp connector in dev_priv->psr.enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Trying to fish that one out through looping is a bit a locking
nightmare. So just set it and use it in the work struct.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  3 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index f5db29428406..759f7c6d1622 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -633,10 +633,11 @@ struct i915_drrs {
        struct intel_connector *connector;
 };

+struct intel_dp;
 struct i915_psr {
        bool sink_support;
        bool source_ok;
-       bool enabled;
+       struct intel_dp *enabled;
        bool active;
        struct delayed_work work;
 };
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index ac1cef459a7b..10bcc052df4b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1826,7 +1826,7 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_do_enable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
        /* Enable PSR on the host */
        intel_edp_psr_enable_source(intel_dp);

-       dev_priv->psr.enabled = true;
+       dev_priv->psr.enabled = intel_dp;

I liked this very much...
 
        dev_priv->psr.active = true;
 }

@@ -1867,26 +1867,19 @@ void intel_edp_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
                       EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) == 0, 2000, 10))
                DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle State\n");

-       dev_priv->psr.enabled = false;
+       dev_priv->psr.enabled = NULL;
 }

 static void intel_edp_psr_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
                container_of(work, typeof(*dev_priv), psr.work.work);
-       struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
-       struct intel_encoder *encoder;
-       struct intel_dp *intel_dp = NULL;
-
-       list_for_each_entry(encoder, &dev->mode_config.encoder_list, base.head)
-               if (encoder->type == INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP) {
-                       intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&encoder->base);
+       struct intel_dp *intel_dp = dev_priv->psr.enabled;


but I'm afraid to give NULL to below functions...
Shouldn't we add a if(!intel_dp) return;  at least just to be on the safe side?

-                       if (!intel_edp_psr_match_conditions(intel_dp))
-                               intel_edp_psr_disable(intel_dp);
-                       else
-                               intel_edp_psr_do_enable(intel_dp);
-               }
+       if (!intel_edp_psr_match_conditions(intel_dp))
+               intel_edp_psr_disable(intel_dp);
+       else
+               intel_edp_psr_do_enable(intel_dp);
 }

 static void intel_edp_psr_inactivate(struct drm_device *dev)
--
2.0.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



--
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux