Re: [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Run psr_setup unconditionally

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Due to runtime pm and system s/r we need to restore hw state every
time we enable a pipe again. Hence trying to avoid that is just
pointless book-keeping which Rodrigo then tried to work around by
manually adding psr_setup calls to our resume code.

Much simpler to just remove code instead.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 8 --------
 2 files changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 64d520f7e8d9..f5db29428406 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -636,7 +636,6 @@ struct i915_drrs {
 struct i915_psr {
        bool sink_support;
        bool source_ok;
-       bool setup_done;
        bool enabled;
        bool active;
        struct delayed_work work;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 8717d3b9667c..4ab4757fb53d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1663,9 +1663,6 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_setup(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
        struct edp_vsc_psr psr_vsc;

-       if (dev_priv->psr.setup_done)
-               return;
-
        /* Prepare VSC packet as per EDP 1.3 spec, Table 3.10 */
        memset(&psr_vsc, 0, sizeof(psr_vsc));
        psr_vsc.sdp_header.HB0 = 0;
@@ -1677,8 +1674,6 @@ static void intel_edp_psr_setup(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
        /* Avoid continuous PSR exit by masking memup and hpd */
        I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL(dev), EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_MEMUP |
                   EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_HPD | EDP_PSR_DEBUG_MASK_LPSP);
-
-       dev_priv->psr.setup_done = true;
 }

 static void intel_edp_psr_enable_sink(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
@@ -1911,9 +1906,6 @@ void intel_edp_psr_exit(struct drm_device *dev, bool schedule_back)
        if (!HAS_PSR(dev))
                return;

-       if (!dev_priv->psr.setup_done)
-               return; 
-

I'd add here:
+       if (!dev_priv->psr.enabled)
+               return; 

 
        cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work);

        if (dev_priv->psr.active)
--
2.0.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-g

with or without it: 
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>

--
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
 
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux