On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:30:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:09:29PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Otherwise we print out spurious processes on unused rings in the error > > state. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Personally would have done that in the dumper code, not the recording code > - this here looks a bit inconsistent. Either way this is It gets used in multiple locations, in particular inside the capture code itself, so it looked simpler to initialise it always. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
