Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: do runtime_get/put during display well power gate/ungate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sagar,

On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 00:27 +0530, sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Sagar Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Display power island is on during boot, we have one count for it
> once this power gates, we do a put making sure runtime_suspend is
> called
> 
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> (supporter:INTEL DRM DRIVERS...)
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:INTEL DRM DRIVERS...)
> Signed-off-by: Sagar Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index f83d1ff..b333aae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6017,6 +6017,12 @@ void __vlv_set_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  			  state,
>  			  vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_PWRGT_CTRL));
>  
> +	if (PUNIT_POWER_WELL_DISP2D == power_well_id) {
> +		if (enable)
> +			intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> +		else
> +			intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
> +	}

The RPM refcount should already be get/put properly in
intel_display_power_get/put(), so the above doesn't seem correct to me.

With current -nightly after blanking the screen the RPM refcount does
drop to 0 for me, so I'm not sure what you're missing. One possibility
is:

# echo auto > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:02.0/power/control

--Imre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux