On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 06:41:54AM +0100, Sharma, Shashank wrote: > Hi Damien, > Please correct me if I am missing something, but the only reason we > are seeing those extra formatting changes is, almost all of the old > MIPI register definitions were beyond 80 char, and was checked in like > that with warnings (How ?) So when I was checking for checkpatch > errors, I saw that, and I tried to fix that in the previous patch. You're absolutely correct. However that 80 chars limit is a soft one and I think, in that case, being able to review the patch wins. Would someone think it's a good idea to have those definitions under 80 chars, one could always send a patch *just* changing that. I wouln't bother. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
