On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 02:47:56PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:12:07PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > Some platforms may not have it, and enumerating it is both confusing and
> > time consuming due to the hotplug and DDC probing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > index 3697433..6a6406f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> > @@ -10678,7 +10678,7 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
> > intel_lvds_init(dev);
> >
> > - if (!IS_ULT(dev))
> > + if (!IS_ULT(dev) && dev_priv->vbt.int_crt_support)
> > intel_crt_init(dev);
> >
> > if (HAS_DDI(dev)) {
>
> For the love of god, can we please rename "bits X" in the
> struct bdb_general_features? That caused me endless pain. It should be
> "byte 0"
>
> Also, I guess there is a problem when the VBT is missing, and we have a
> dont have a CRT on non-ULT (since the default seems to be true). This
> however is no worse than the current situation AFAICT.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
