On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:05:21AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > @@ -8166,6 +8296,8 @@ static int intel_crtc_cursor_move(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y) > intel_crtc->cursor_x = clamp_t(int, x, SHRT_MIN, SHRT_MAX); > intel_crtc->cursor_y = clamp_t(int, y, SHRT_MIN, SHRT_MAX); > > + intel_sync_crtcs(crtc->dev->dev_private); > + > if (intel_crtc->active) > intel_crtc_update_cursor(crtc, intel_crtc->cursor_bo != NULL); > Since the pending CRTC enable/disable will set the cursor anyway, this sync could be avoided if intel_crtc->active was accurate. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
