On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:54:21PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:06:58PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > The PDPs seem to get screwed up otherwise, specifically PDP0. I am not > > really clear why this is required, it just works with full PPGTT. > > > > v2: Only do it for gen8, to limit regression potential > > > > v3: Fix the bugzilla links > > I should note there is a problem with this patch. Without full PPGTT, we > also do a restore inhibit on the default context, and therefore any test > which is running and not using contexts (like everything in IGT) is > programming restore inhibit as well as force restore, which as has been > pointed out in the semaphore series is weird at best. > > All I know is the patch fixed at least a few of the bugs mentioned > below. I guess we'll figure out what to do when the QA results come in. > > [snip] > Okay, now I am really confused. I've changed machines and none of these tests are passing for me now. Until I figured out what happened, please ignore this thread. Sorry for the noise. -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
