Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Improve irq handling after gpu resets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:51:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:56:35PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Currently we do a full re-init of all interrupts after a gpu hang.
> > Which is pretty bad since we don't restore the interrupts we've
> > enabled at runtime correctly. Even with that addressed it's rather
> > horribly race.
> > 
> > But on g4x and later we only reset the gt and not the entire gpu.
> > Which means we only need to reset the GT interrupt bits. Which has the
> > nice benefit that vblank waits, pipe CRC interrupts and everything
> > else display related just keeps on working.
> > 
> > The downside is that gt interrupt handling (i.e. ring->get/put_irq) is
> > still racy. But as long as the gpu hang reliably wakes all waters and
> > we have a short time where the refcount drops to 0 we'll recover. So
> > not that bad really.
> 
> A quick test on IVB tells me that GTIMR and GEN6_PMIMR survive the full
> gt reset. But the ring IMRs do get clobbered. So could we just skip the
> entire irq reset here?

Hm ... And things still neatly work afterwards?

I guess the FIXME we need to keep since clobbering the per-ring registers
through the reset is still racy. But we'd only need to restore the bits
correctly.

I'll respin.
-Daniel

> 
> > 
> > Testcase: igt/kms_flip/vblank-vs-hang
> > Testcase: igt/kms_pipe_crc_basic/hang-*
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index c83c83b74bf4..69a75bb7ad83 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -811,17 +811,18 @@ int i915_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		/*
> > -		 * FIXME: This is horribly race against concurrent pageflip and
> > -		 * vblank wait ioctls since they can observe dev->irqs_disabled
> > -		 * being false when they shouldn't be able to.
> > +		 * FIXME: This races pretty badly against concurrent holders of
> > +		 * ring interrupts. This is possible since we've started to drop
> > +		 * dev->struct_mutex in select places when waiting for the gpu.
> >  		 */
> > -		drm_irq_uninstall(dev);
> > -		drm_irq_install(dev, dev->pdev->irq);
> > +		intel_gt_irq_reinit(dev);
> >  
> > -		/* rps/rc6 re-init is necessary to restore state lost after the
> > -		 * reset and the re-install of drm irq. Skip for ironlake per
> > +		/*
> > +		 * rps/rc6 re-init is necessary to restore state lost after the
> > +		 * reset and the re-install of gt irqs. Skip for ironlake per
> >  		 * previous concerns that it doesn't respond well to some forms
> > -		 * of re-init after reset. */
> > +		 * of re-init after reset.
> > +		 */
> >  		if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen > 5)
> >  			intel_reset_gt_powersave(dev);
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 459b02ad1ef3..61792c4050e7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -2078,6 +2078,7 @@ void gen6_set_pm_mask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pm_iir,
> >  							int new_delay);
> >  extern void intel_irq_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> >  extern void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> > +extern void intel_gt_irq_reinit(struct drm_device *dev);
> >  
> >  extern void intel_uncore_sanitize(struct drm_device *dev);
> >  extern void intel_uncore_early_sanitize(struct drm_device *dev);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > index 3cd659b47dd2..6dba645a81fa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> > @@ -3140,6 +3140,14 @@ static void valleyview_irq_preinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  	POSTING_READ(VLV_IER);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void gen8_gt_irq_reset(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +{
> > +	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 0);
> > +	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 1);
> > +	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 2);
> > +	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 3);
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void gen8_irq_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > @@ -3148,10 +3156,7 @@ static void gen8_irq_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  	I915_WRITE(GEN8_MASTER_IRQ, 0);
> >  	POSTING_READ(GEN8_MASTER_IRQ);
> >  
> > -	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 0);
> > -	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 1);
> > -	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 2);
> > -	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 3);
> > +	gen8_gt_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> >  
> >  	for_each_pipe(pipe)
> >  		GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(DE_PIPE, pipe);
> > @@ -3171,10 +3176,7 @@ static void cherryview_irq_preinstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  	I915_WRITE(GEN8_MASTER_IRQ, 0);
> >  	POSTING_READ(GEN8_MASTER_IRQ);
> >  
> > -	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 0);
> > -	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 1);
> > -	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 2);
> > -	GEN8_IRQ_RESET_NDX(GT, 3);
> > +	gen8_gt_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> >  
> >  	GEN5_IRQ_RESET(GEN8_PCU_);
> >  
> > @@ -4436,6 +4438,23 @@ void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->irq_lock, irqflags);
> >  }
> >  
> > +void intel_gt_irq_reinit(struct drm_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > +
> > +	spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> > +	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) {
> > +		gen8_gt_irq_reset(dev_priv);
> > +		gen8_gt_irq_postinstall(dev_priv);
> > +	} else if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5) {
> > +		gen5_gt_irq_reset(dev);
> > +		gen5_gt_irq_postinstall(dev);
> > +	} else {
> > +		WARN_ON(!IS_G4X(dev));
> > +	}
> > +	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Disable interrupts so we can allow runtime PM. */
> >  void intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(struct drm_device *dev)
> >  {
> > -- 
> > 1.8.4.rc3
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux