On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 06:39:33PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Share the waitqueue that drm_irq uses when performing the vblank evade
> trick for atomic pipe updates.
>
> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 --
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 5 +++--
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 304f86a..5905a9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -1724,19 +1724,6 @@ static void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pm_iir)
> }
> }
>
> -static bool intel_pipe_handle_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe)
> -{
> - struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> -
> - if (!drm_handle_vblank(dev, pipe))
> - return false;
> -
> - crtc = to_intel_crtc(intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev, pipe));
> - wake_up(&crtc->vbl_wait);
> -
> - return true;
> -}
Can we keep this bare wrapper? It is quite useful for hooking in vblank
checks - i.e. saves me having to reinrtoduce it.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
