Re: [PATCH 11/12] [RFC] drm/irq: More robustness in drm_vblank_on|off

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:51:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > If we want to use this functionality in generic helpers to make
> > sure that all drivers have somewhat sane vblank handling across
> > modesets/dpms, we need to make it work for all drivers. But some
> > don't support interrupts and hence also not vblank waits.
> > 
> > Just return early on such drivers.
> > 
> > Note that with pageflips drivers are free to implement them however
> > they wish to.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> I'm confused. This seems to be the very same patch as 09/12. But since
> you've already merged this I guess it must have resolved itself
> somehow...

Screwed up the patch sending and submitted two patch 09/12. This one
really is just rfc and I didn't pull it in yet.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux