On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 08:56:08AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:53:28AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:23:06PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > Try to flush out dirty pages into the swapcache (and from there into the > > > swapfile) when under memory pressure and forced to drop GEM objects from > > > memory. In effect, this should just allow us to discard unused pages for > > > memory reclaim and to start writeback earlier. > > > > > > v2: Hugh Dickins warned that explicitly starting writeback from > > > shrink_slab was prone to deadlocks within shmemfs. > > > > > > Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Merged all four patches. Can you please go through bugzilla and poke all > > relevant patches for retesting? I think I've made a sufficient fool of > > myself yesterday to not attempt this ;-) > > 4 patches? The series tested had 5... Those 5 didn't show up till just today ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
