Re: [PATCH 1/2] igt/intel_iosf: rename IOSF sideband opcodes according to the spec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 08:03 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Mon, 19 May 2014 16:48:31 +0300
> Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > These opcodes are not specific for an endpoint, but are the same for all
> > endpoints. So rename them accordingly, using the name the VLV2 sideband
> > HAS uses. Also move the macros to the .c file, since they aren't used
> > anywhere else.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  lib/intel_iosf.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> >  lib/intel_reg.h  |  5 -----
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/intel_iosf.c b/lib/intel_iosf.c
> > index 7e25159..26d6d01 100644
> > --- a/lib/intel_iosf.c
> > +++ b/lib/intel_iosf.c
> > @@ -8,13 +8,21 @@
> >  
> >  #define TIMEOUT_US 500000
> >  
> > +/* Standard MMIO read, non-posted */
> > +#define SB_MRD_NP      0x00
> > +/* Standard MMIO write, non-posted */
> > +#define SB_MWR_NP      0x01
> > +/* Private register read, double-word addressing, non-posted */
> > +#define SB_CRRDDA_NP   0x06
> > +/* Private register write, double-word addressing, non-posted */
> > +#define SB_CRWRDA_NP   0x07
> > +
> >  static int vlv_sideband_rw(uint32_t port, uint8_t opcode, uint32_t addr,
> >  			   uint32_t *val)
> >  {
> >  	int timeout = 0;
> >  	uint32_t cmd, devfn, be, bar;
> > -	int is_read = (opcode == PUNIT_OPCODE_REG_READ ||
> > -		       opcode == DPIO_OPCODE_REG_READ);
> > +	int is_read = (opcode == SB_CRRDDA_NP || opcode == SB_MRD_NP);
> >  
> >  	bar = 0;
> >  	be = 0xf;
> > @@ -67,7 +75,7 @@ static int vlv_sideband_rw(uint32_t port, uint8_t opcode, uint32_t addr,
> >   */
> >  int intel_punit_read(uint8_t addr, uint32_t *val)
> >  {
> > -	return vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_PUNIT, PUNIT_OPCODE_REG_READ, addr, val);
> > +	return vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_PUNIT, SB_CRRDDA_NP, addr, val);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -82,7 +90,7 @@ int intel_punit_read(uint8_t addr, uint32_t *val)
> >   */
> >  int intel_punit_write(uint8_t addr, uint32_t val)
> >  {
> > -	return vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_PUNIT, PUNIT_OPCODE_REG_WRITE, addr, &val);
> > +	return vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_PUNIT, SB_CRWRDA_NP, addr, &val);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -97,7 +105,7 @@ int intel_punit_write(uint8_t addr, uint32_t val)
> >   */
> >  int intel_nc_read(uint8_t addr, uint32_t *val)
> >  {
> > -	return vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_NC, PUNIT_OPCODE_REG_READ, addr, val);
> > +	return vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_NC, SB_CRRDDA_NP, addr, val);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -112,7 +120,7 @@ int intel_nc_read(uint8_t addr, uint32_t *val)
> >   */
> >  int intel_nc_write(uint8_t addr, uint32_t val)
> >  {
> > -	return vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_NC, PUNIT_OPCODE_REG_WRITE, addr, &val);
> > +	return vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_NC, SB_CRWRDA_NP, addr, &val);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -129,7 +137,7 @@ uint32_t intel_dpio_reg_read(uint32_t reg, int phy)
> >  {
> >  	uint32_t val;
> >  
> > -	vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_DPIO, DPIO_OPCODE_REG_READ, reg, &val);
> > +	vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_DPIO, SB_MRD_NP, reg, &val);
> >  	return val;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -143,5 +151,5 @@ uint32_t intel_dpio_reg_read(uint32_t reg, int phy)
> >   */
> >  void intel_dpio_reg_write(uint32_t reg, uint32_t val, int phy)
> >  {
> > -	vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_DPIO, DPIO_OPCODE_REG_WRITE, reg, &val);
> > +	vlv_sideband_rw(IOSF_PORT_DPIO, SB_MWR_NP, reg, &val);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/lib/intel_reg.h b/lib/intel_reg.h
> > index 4b3a102..5520624 100644
> > --- a/lib/intel_reg.h
> > +++ b/lib/intel_reg.h
> > @@ -3576,9 +3576,4 @@ typedef enum {
> >  #define VLV_IOSF_DATA				(VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x2104)
> >  #define VLV_IOSF_ADDR				(VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x2108)
> >  
> > -#define DPIO_OPCODE_REG_READ			0
> > -#define DPIO_OPCODE_REG_WRITE			1
> > -#define PUNIT_OPCODE_REG_READ			6
> > -#define PUNIT_OPCODE_REG_WRITE			7
> > -
> >  #endif /* _I810_REG_H */
> 
> Looks fine to me... you have commit access right?

Yea, I can push it.

--Imre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux