On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:36:09PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 06:40:43PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > I think as soon as we have the golden context stuff from Mika we could > > drop our usage of restore_inhibit. We only need that to avoid the hw > > getting angry if the context state is illegal afaik. > > Apart from the contexts being over 100x larger than the state required > to switch between clients, and that the current code regressed to always > update the context between every batch. We still have the from == to early return in do_switch. That doesn't do what it should any more? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
