On Thu, 15 May 2014, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:13:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 08 May 2014, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > +static void snb_wm_latency_quirk(struct drm_device *dev) >> > +{ >> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; >> > + bool changed; >> > + >> > + /* >> > + * The BIOS provided WM memory latency values are often >> > + * inadequate for high resolution displays. Adjust them. >> > + */ >> > + changed = ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.pri_latency, 12) | >> > + ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.spr_latency, 12) | >> > + ilk_increase_wm_latency(dev_priv, dev_priv->wm.cur_latency, 12); >> >> Nitpick, s/|/||/g for bools. > > Consider side effects. Ugh I'm slow today. Some might claim business as usual. I'll hide somewhere. Before I head under the rock, may I say bitops on bools are still ugly? BR, Jani. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx