On Wed, 14 May 2014, Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 13.05.2014 22:24, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> On Tue, 13 May 2014 16:50:12 +0100 >> Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:07:37PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: >>>> This matches the algorithm used by earlier kernels when selecting the >>>> mode for the fbcon. And only if there is no modes at all, do we fall >>>> back to using the BIOS configuration. Seamless transition is still >>>> preserved (from the BIOS configuration to ours) so long as the BIOS has >>>> also chosen what we hope is the native configuration. >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78655 >>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > I don't think that Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is necessary, kernels up > to 3.14.x don't expose the problem. And as this fixes a post-3.14 > regression this is a clear candidate for 3.15 Chris, do we drop cc: stable? Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
