Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Ringbuffer signal func for the second BSD ring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:44:59PM +0100, oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This is missing in:
> 
> commit 78325f2d270897c9ee0887125b7abb963eb8efea
> Author: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Tue Apr 29 14:52:29 2014 -0700
> 
>     drm/i915: Virtualize the ringbuffer signal func
> 
> Looks to me like a rebase side-effect...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@xxxxxxxxx>

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. Iirc there's been a regression
report too. Anyone know the bugzilla?
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index 9907d66..203fa2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -2182,6 +2182,7 @@ int intel_init_bsd2_ring_buffer(struct drm_device *dev)
>  	ring->dispatch_execbuffer =
>  			gen8_ring_dispatch_execbuffer;
>  	ring->semaphore.sync_to = gen6_ring_sync;
> +	ring->semaphore.signal = gen6_signal;
>  	/*
>  	 * The current semaphore is only applied on the pre-gen8. And there
>  	 * is no bsd2 ring on the pre-gen8. So now the semaphore_register
> -- 
> 1.9.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux