On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:30:11AM +0000, Mateo Lozano, Oscar wrote: > > Did you consider my alternative fix of restoring the old value in the error path? > > Is that directed to Daniel or me? Restoring the old value is way easier, but I thought you wanted to keep is_pin_display as a theory of operation? And Daniel might still want an IGT test, I suppose... > I'd like to be able to kill is_pin_display(), it's very fragile but I don't have a better alternative yet. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
