On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Please don't make things more prominent if the fixes can't be merged > without rewriting the world, > > Distros have auto reporting tools for the major backtrace warnings, > and releasing kernels with unfixable ones in it make it hard to know > what is real and what isn't. Fully agreed if we can't fix them. But we also need to strike some balance for otherwise we can never enable we self-tests. And I absolutely want those enable to have the best possible regression testing coverage. E.g. every time we add a substantial amount of new checks to the modeset state checker it takes 1-2 releases to settle all the fallout. But we're backporting all the fixes, except when they're too invasive (in which case we disable the check temporarily or restrict it). -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
